“So far we don’t see anything that looks strange in any of the imagery, or off-nominal.” “What we think - and this is just a theory at this point - is that aerodynamically the three other canopies may sort of shade, if you will, one of the other canopies, and it just struggles to inflate at times.”īecause this happened on two consecutive missions, he said, NASA and SpaceX are taking extra time to inspect the parachutes and examine other data from those missions. “This lagging parachute phenomenon is something we see with these large ringsail parachutes,” Stich said. Bill Gerstenmaier, vice president of build and flight reliability at SpaceX, later suggested those earlier incidents involved a different version of the parachutes than the Mark 3 parachutes used on the current Dragon spacecraft. He added lagging parachute openings had been seen on earlier cargo missions but did not identify specific ones. Steve Stich, NASA commercial crew program manager, said that lagging parachute on the CRS-24 mission opened 63 seconds after the other three, compared to 75 seconds on the Crew-2 splashdown. 24 may be an artifact of the aerodynamics of those parachute systems, but they will examine the phenomenon in more detail before the next Dragon missions. 8 and the CRS-24 cargo mission splashdown Jan. 4 briefing that it’s possible that the delayed opening of one of four parachutes on both the Crew-2 splashdown Nov.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |